Overpressure Generation Mechanism in One of Hydrocarbon Fields in Southern Iran

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

SUT

Abstract

Pore pressure is defined as the pressure of the fluid inside the pore space of the formation, also known as the formation pressure. When the pore pressure is higher than hydrostatic pressure, it refers to as overpressure. Overpressure can make many problems such as kicks, blowouts, wellbore instability, hole washouts and loss of drilling mud circulation. Overpressure is generated due to different mechanisms; such as, compaction disequilibrium, oil to gas generation, buoyancy effect and lateral transfer. Each mechanism effects on exceed pressure in a significant way. So far, several methods have been proposed in pore pressure prediction using well logs and seismic data. Each method relies on a consideration that over pressure is resulting from a specific mechanism as the main factor, and it is also provided an empirical formula for estimation of pore pressure. Hence, geological studies to understand the overpressure generation mechanism and also choose the appropriated pore pressure estimation method are very important. The main objective of this study is to determine the mechanism of high pressure using well log information and provides the best method of estimating the pore pressure in one of hydrocarbon fields in southern Iran. To obtain this goal, the overpressure mechanism generation is studied from sonic log, density log, pore pressure and vertical effective stress information. The results suggest more disequilibrium compaction as the main mechanism and less unloading mechanism behind the overpressure. So, the Eaton and Bowers methods are used to estimation pore pressure  and the results show agreement with the pore pressure prediction from formation pressure test.
 

Keywords


 
[1]. Swarbrick B. and Osborne M. J., “Mechanisms that generate abnormal pressures: an overview”, AAPG Memoir 70, United Kingdom, pp. 13-34, 1998.##
[2]. Ungerer P., Behar E. and Discamps D., “Tentative calculation of the overall volume expansion of organic matter during hydrocarbon genesis from geochemistry data, Implications for primary migration,” Advances in Organic Geochemistry, Vol. 10, pp. 129-135, 1981.##
[3]. Mackenzie A. S. and Quigley T. M., “Principles of geochemical prospect appraisal,” AAPG Bulletin, Vol. 72, pp. 399-415, 1988.##
[4]. Katsube T., Williamson M. and Best M., “Shale pore structure evolution and its effect on permeability,” 33th Annual Symposium of the Society of Professional Well Log Analysts (SPWLA), Symposium, pp. 1-22, 1992.##
[5]. Bowers G. and Katsube T. J., “The role of shale pore structure on the sensitivity of wire-line logs to overpressure,” AAPG Memoir 76, pp. 43-60, 2002.##
[6]. Yardley G. S. and Swarbrick R. E., “Lateral transfer: a source of additional overpressure?,” Marine and Petroleum Geology, Vol. 17, pp. 523-537, 2000.##
[7]. Traugott M., “The pore pressure centroid concept: reducing drilling risks, compaction and overpressure current research,” pp. 9-10, Dec., IFP, Paris, 1996.##
[8]. آزادپور م.، "پیش‌بینی و مدل‌سازی فشار منفذی با استفاده از اطلاعات چاه‌پیمایی در میدان گازی پارس جنوبی"، پایان نامة کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه صنعتی سهند، دانشکدة مهندسی معدن، 1392.##
[9]. Eaton B., “The equation for geopressure prediction from well logs,” Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Dallas, Texas, 1975.##
[10]. حسین پور صیامی ح.، مبانی ارزیابی فشار سازند، پژوهشگاه صنعت نفت، تهران، 1389.##
[11]. Bowers G., “Pore pressure estimation from velocity data: Accounting for overpressure mechanisms besides undercompaction,” SPE Drilling & Completion, Vol. 10, pp. 89-95, 1995.##