Effect of Saturation Hysteresis and Wettability on Saturation Exponent Calculation

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Researcher, Research Institute of Petroleum Industry (RIPI)

Abstract

The determination of fluid saturation is vital for the estimation of hydrocarbon in place which is the base for economic decision making about reservoir production. Archie’s equations are the most prevalent equations used for saturation calculation. One of the important parameters in these equations is saturation exponent. Saturation exponent has fundamental difference comparing with other parameters which are cementation exponent and tortuosity. Cementation exponent and tortuosity mostly depend on rock type but saturation exponent depends on the distribution of fluids and therefore the hysteresis of saturation during imbibitions and drainage and also wettability. The purpose of this research is an investigation into the effect of saturation hysteresis and wettability on saturation exponent. The saturation exponent was measured from primary drainage to secondary drainage with a four-electrode system at reservoir temperature with reservoir fluids on some cylindrical core samples. Dynamic porous plate technique was used, for which full capillary pressure curves and wettability with combined Amott-USBM were determined simultaneously. It was concluded that the saturation hysteresis affects saturation exponent in different samples during imbibition and drainage and cause it to range from 0.1 to 0.66; the variations were higher in oil-wet samples than water-wet samples.

Keywords

References

مراجع
[1] Archie G.E., “The electrical resistivity log as aid in determining some reservoir characteristics”, Trans, AIME, 146, pp. 54-62, 1942.
[2] Focke J.W. and Munn D., “Cementation exponents in Middle Eastern carbonate reservoirs”, SPE paper No. 13735, SPE Formation Evaluation, 2, pp. 155-167, 1987.
[3] Salem H.S. and Chilingarian G.V., “Determination of specific surface area and mean grain size from well log and their influence on the physical behavior of offshore reservoir”, JPSE, 22, pp. 241-252, 1999.
[4] Byrnes A.P., Franseen E.K., Wateney W.L., and Dobois M.K., The role of moldic porosity in Paleozoic Kansas reservoirs and the association of original depositional facies and early diagenesis with reservoir properties, AAPG, Annual Convention in Salt Lake City Utah, 2003.
[5] Hirasaki G.J., Flow and transport through porous media, Course note, 2005.
Jackson P.D., Taylor Smith D., Stanford P.N., “Resistivity-porosity-particle shape relationships for marine sands”, Geophysics, 43, pp. 1250-1262, 1978.
[6] Longeron D.G., Argaud M.J., and Bouvier L., “Resistivity index and capillary pressure measurements under reservoir conditions using crude oil”, SPE paper No. 19589, presented at the 64rd Annual Technical Conference, San Antonio, TX, October 8-11, 1989.
[7] Lyle W.D., and Mills W.R., “Effect of nonuniform core saturation on laboratory determination of the Archie saturation exponent”, SPE Formation Evaluation, pp. 49-52, 1989.
[8] Gray R., Trewin B., Pallatt N., and Mitchell P., “Comparison of saturation exponent data by the porous plate and the countineous injection technique with in-situ saturation monitoring”, Third European Core Analysis Symposium, Paris, September 14-16, 1992.
[9] Anderson W.G., “Wettability literatures survey-part 3, the effect of wettability on the electrical properties of porous media”, JPT, 38, 1371-1378, 1986.
[10] Al-Kaabi A.U., Mimoune K., and Al-Yousef H.Y., “Effect of hysteresis on the Archie saturation exponent”, SPE, paper No. 37738, pp. 497-520, 1997.
[11] Wei j.Z., and Lile O.B., Hysteresis of the resistivity index in Berea sandstone, Advanced in Core Evaluation Accuracy and Precision in Reservoir Estimation, Reviewed Proc, in First Society Core Analysts, European Core Analysis Symposium, P.F., 1990.
[12] Knight R., “Hysteresis in the electrical resistivity of partially saturated sandstone”, Geophysics, 56, 2139-2147.
[13] Tweheyo, M.T., Talukdar, M.S., and Torsaeter, O., 2001, Hysteresis effect in capillary pressure, relative permeability and resistivity index of North Sea chalk, SCA, paper No. 65, 1991.
[14] Amott E., “Observation relating to the wettability of porous rock”, Trans, AIME, 216. pp. 156-162, 1959.
[15] Morgan W.B., and Pirson S.J., “The effect of fractional wettability on the Archie saturation exponent”, Trans, SPWLA, Fifth Annual Logging Symposium, Midland, TX, Sec. B., 1964.
[16] Lewis M.G., Sharma M.M., Dunlop H.F., and Dorfman M.H., “Techniques for measuring the electrical properties of sandstone cores”, 63rd SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE paper No. 18178, Houston, Texas, 1988.
[17] Wei j.Z., and Lile O.B., “Influence of wettability on two and four electrode resistivity measurements on Berea sandstone plugs”, SPE formation evaluation, 6, 470-476, 1991.
[18] Sweeney S.A., and Jennings H.V., “Effect of wettability on electrical resistivity of carbonate rock from petroleum reservoir”, J. Phys. Chem, 64, 551-553, 1960.
Journal of Petroleum Research
Volume 22, Issue 69 - Serial Number 69
May and June 2012
Pages 53-63

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics