Syngas Production by Partial Oxidation of Methane and CO2 Conversion Using Chemical Looping Method

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Gas Conversion Group, Gas Research Division, Research Institute of Petroleum Industry (RIPI), Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Syngas (a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide) could be produced by natural gas (methane) with steam or oxygen. The current methods such as catalytic reforming and autothermal deal with high energy consumption and cost demands. As an alternative, chemical looping reforming could be used with versatile features such as no need of pure oxygen, low CO2 reduction and better process integration. In the current article, a dynamic chemical looping process is employed to produce syngas resulted in the reduction of a perovskite oxygen carrier from methane. After that, the re-oxidation is performed in two steps with both CO2 and Air. The perovskite catalyst, synthesized by combustion method, was tested in a fixed-bed reactor in a dynamic manner. In the reduction reactor, however, the syngas was produced in a limited time. The CO2 produced during the reduction was below 5%, which is lower than that of the common methods. By continuing the reduction reactions, a high amount of hydrogen is produced, but solid coke is formed too. Hence, the reduction is partially performed. To compensate the consumed oxygen of the perovskite lattice, at first, the greenhouse gas of CO2 is injected into the reactor, followed by oxidation by Air. Moreover, the coke removal (combustion) is performed during these two oxidation steps. The results show that, the methane conversion is reached to 90% during the first 30 min of the reduction. A vast majority of CO2 is converted to CO in only 17 min of the first oxidation step. In addition, the time that is required for air-re-oxidation to remove the cokes is equal to 20 minutes. Finally, according to the obtained results, both CO2 and Air could not only remove the formed solid carbon, but it also compensated the oxygen vacancies inside the lattice.
 

Keywords

References

[1]. Sharifi M., Haghighi M., Rahemi N., and Rahmani F., “A comparative synthesis and physicochemical characterizations of Ni/Al2O3 nanocatalyst via sequential impregnation and Sol-Gel methods used for dry reforming of methane,” J. Pet. Res., Vol. 27, No. 2–96, pp. 146–159, Aug. 2017. ##
[2]. Zamaniyan A., Ebrahimi H. and Mohammadzadeh J. S. S., “A unified model for top fired methane steam reformers using three-dimensional zonal analysis,” Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif., Vol. 47, No. 5, pp. 946–956, 2008.##
3]. Shayegh F., Rekabdar F., Akbar Zamani Brijanian H., Khakdaman H. and Masoudi M. R., “Designing syngas production pilot plant using H2O/CO2 reforming process,” J. Pet. Res., Vol. 17, No. 56.2, pp. 4–14, Aug. 2013.##
[4]. Rezaei M., Alavi S. M., Sahebdel S. and Zi-fang Yan, “Stable catalyst for dry reforming process,” J. Pet. Res., Vol. 18, No. 58, pp. 11–23, Aug. 2013.##
[5]. Nourbakhsh H., Rahbar Shahrouzi J., Ebrahimi H., Zamaniyan A. and Jafari Nasr M. R., “Experimental and numerical study of syngas production during premixed and ultra-rich partial oxidation of methane in a porous reactor,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2019.##
[6]. Ebrahimi H. and Rahmani M., “Modeling chemical looping syngas production in a microreactor using perovskite oxygen carriers,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 43, Issue 10, pp. 5231-5248 2018.##
[7]. Nourbakhsh H., Rahbar Shahrouzi J., Zamaniyan A., Ebrahimi H. and Jafari Nasr M. R., “A thermodynamic analysis of biogas partial oxidation to synthesis gas with emphasis on soot formation,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 43, No. 33, pp. 15703–15719, Aug. 2018.##
[8]. De Groote A. M. and Froment G. F., “The role of coke formation in catalytic partial oxidation for synthesis gas production,” Catal. Today, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 309–329, 1997.##
[9]. Sharifi M., Haghighi M., Alizadeh Eslami A., Rahmani F. and Rahemi N., “Synthesis and Characterization of Ni-Cu/Al2O3-ZrO2 Nanocatalyst via Sequential Impregnation and Sol-Gel Methods Used in CH4/CO2 Conversion to Syngas,” J. Pet. Res., Vol. 25, No. 85–1, pp. 142–157, Jan. 2016. ##
[10]. Welty J. A. B., “Apparatus for conversion of hydrocarbons,” 2,550,741, 1951. ##
[11]. Otsuka K., Ushiyama T. and Yamanaka I., “Partial oxidation of methane using the redox of cerium oxide,” Chem. Lett., 1993. ##
[12]. Otsuka K., Sunada E., Ushiyama T. and Yamanaka I., “The production of synthesis gas by the redox of cerium oxide,” Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., Vol. 107, pp. 531–536, Jan. 1997. ##
[13]. Otsuka K., Wang Y., Sunada E. and Yamanaka I., “Direct partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas by cerium oxide,” Journal of Catalysis, Vol. 175, Issue 2, pp. 152-160 1998. ##
[14]. Stenberg V., Rydén M., Mattisson T. and Lyngfelt A., “Exploring novel hydrogen production processes by integration of steam methane reforming with chemical-looping combustion (CLC-SMR) and oxygen carrier aided combustion (OCAC-SMR),” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 74, pp. 28-39, 2018. ##
[15]. Rydén M., Lyngfelt A. and Mattisson T., “Chemical-Looping combustion and chemical-looping reforming in a circulating fluidized-bed reactor using ni-based oxygen carriers,” Energy & Fuels, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 2585–2597, Jul. 2008. ##
[16]. Adanez J., Abad A., Garcia-Labiano F., Gayan P. and de Diego L. F., “Progress in chemical-looping combustion and reforming technologies,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 215–282, Apr. 2012. ##
[17]. Han L., Zhou Z. and Bollas G. M., “Heterogeneous modeling of chemical-looping combustion. Part 1: Reactor model,” Chem. Eng. Sci., Vol. 104, pp. 233–249, 2013. ##
[18]. Luo S., Zeng L., Xu D., Kathe M., Chung E., Deshpande N., Qin L., Majumder A., Hsieh T. L., Tong A., Suna Zh. and Fan D L., “Shale gas-to-syngas chemical looping process for stable shale gas conversion to high purity syngas with a H2:CO ratio of 2:1,” Energy Environ. Sci., 2014. ##
[19]. Nadgouda S. G., Guo M., Tong A. and Fan L. S., “High purity syngas and hydrogen coproduction using copper-iron oxygen carriers in chemical looping reforming process,” Appl. Energy, Vol. 235, pp. 1415–1426, Feb. 2019. ##
[20]. Bhavsar S., Najera M., Solunke R. and Veser G., “Chemical looping: To combustion and beyond,” Catal. Today, Vol. 228, pp. 96–105, Jun. 2014. ##
[21]. Cabello A., Gayán P., García-Labiano F., de Diego L. F., Abad A., Izquierdo M. T. and Adánez J., “Relevance of the catalytic activity on the performance of a NiO/CaAl2O4 oxygen carrier in a CLC process,” Appl. Catal. B Environ., Vol. 147, pp. 980–987, Apr. 2014. ##
[22]. Hu J., Galvita V. V., Poelman H. and Marin B. G., “Advanced chemical looping materials for CO2 utilization: a review,” Materials , Vol. 11, No. 7. 2018. ##
[23]. Lim H. S., Kang D. and Lee J. W., “Phase transition of Fe2O3–NiO to NiFe2O4 in perovskite catalytic particles for enhanced methane chemical looping reforming-decomposition with CO2 conversion,” Appl. Catal. B Environ, Vol. 202, pp. 175–183, Mar. 2017. ##
[24]. He F., Li X., Zhao K., Huang Z., Wei G. and Li H., “The use of La1−xSrxFeO3 perovskite-type oxides as oxygen carriers in chemical-looping reforming of methane,” Fuel, Vol. 108, pp. 465–473, 2013. ##
[25]. Zhao K., He F., Huang Z., Zheng A., Li H. and Zhao Z., “La1-xSrxFeO3 perovskites as oxygen carriers for the partial oxidation of methane to syngas,” Chinese J. Catal., Vol. 35, No. 7, pp. 1196–1205, 2014. ##
[26]. Cheng Z., Qin L., Fan J. A. and Fan L.-S., “New insight into the development of Oxygen carrier materials for chemical looping systems,” Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 343–351, 2018. ##
[27]. Sastre D., Serrano D. P., Pizarro P. and Coronado J. M., “Chemical insights on the activity of La1-xSrxFeO3 perovskites for chemical looping reforming of methane coupled with CO2-splitting,” J. CO2 Util., Vol. 31, pp. 16–26, 2019. ##
[28]. Kathe M.  Empfield A., Sandvik P., Fryer C., Zhang Y., Blair E. and Fan L. S., “Utilization of CO2 as a partial substitute for methane feedstock in chemical looping methane–steam redox processes for syngas production,” Energy Environ. Sci., Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 1345–1349, 2017. ##
Journal of Petroleum Research
Volume 30, 99-1 - Serial Number 110
May and June 2020
Pages 31-41

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics