Investigation the Effect of Ar-Air plasma Treatment on Separation Performance of Nanofiltration Membrane: Influence of Time, Power and Composition of Plasma

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Arak University, Iran

2 Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Arak University, Iran

Abstract

In this study, thin film nanofiltration membranes were modified by using Ar-Air plasma. The effect of plasma time, power and the composition of plasma gases on physico-chemical properties and separation performance of membranes were investigated. The results showed that the plasma treatment caused to increase in membrane surface hydrophilicity considerably. The surface modification of membranes by using plasma treatment led to enhancement of water flux through the membrane obviously. The separation efficiency of membranes due to surface modification was also changed broadly compared to unmodified membrane. The separation efficiency of modified membranes at 35 W and 180 s, 25 W and 120 s, and 15 W and 60 s plasma treatment measured ~30%, 76%-92%  and 77%-89% respectively. The selectivity for un-modified membrane was also measured ~90%. Among all studied membranes, the modified membrane at 50-50 (v/v) Ar-Air plasma, 25 W and 120 s treatment with considerable enhancement of water flux compared to pristine membrane was selected as the optimum sample.
 

Keywords


[1]. Adamson A W, Alice A P, Gast P (1997) Physical chemistry ofsurfaces, Wiley-Interscience, New York, USA. ##
[2]. Khoee S, Bageri Y (2014) Surface modification of magnetite nanoparticles via click reaction for biomedical application, Polymerization, 5: 16-26. ##
[3]. Egitto F D (1990) Plasma etching and modification of organic polymers, Pure and applied Chemistry, 62: 1699-1708. ##
[4]. Inagaki N (1996) Plasma surface modification and plasma polymerization, CRC press, Boca Raton FL, USA. ##
[5]. Wolf R A (2012) Atmospheric pressure plasma for surface modification, 3rd edittion, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, N J, USA, 1-264. ##
[6]. Chapman B N (1980) Glow discharge processes: sputtering andplasma etching, Wiley-Interscience, New York, USA. ##
[7]. Chan C M, Ko T M, Hiraoka H (1996) Polymer surface modification by plasmas and photons, Surface Science Reports, 24: 1-54. ##
[8]. Zhao C, Xue J, Ran F, Sun S (2013) Modification of polyethersulfone membranes- a review of methods, Progress in Materials Science, 58: 76-150. ##
[9]. Luo M L, Zhao J Q, Tang W, Pu C S (2005) Hydrophilic modification of poly(ethersulfone) ultrafiltration membrane surface by self-assembly of TiO2 nanoparticles, Applied Surface Science, 249: 76-84. ##
[10]. Pinnau I, Freeman B D (2004) Advanced materials for membrane separations, American Chemical Society, Washington DC, USA, 947-951. ##
[11]. Kim S M (2013) Surface nanostructuring of polysulfone membranes by atmospheric pressure plasma-induced graft polymerization, University of California, Los Angeles, USA. ##
[12]. Hosseini S M, Madaeni S S, Khodabakhshi A R, Zendehnam A (2010) Preparation and surface modification of PVC/SBR heterogeneous cation exchange membrane with silver nanoparticles by plasma treatment, Journal of Membrane Science, 365: 438-446. ##
[13]. Sadeghi I, Aroujalian A, Raisi A, Dabir B (2013) Surface modification of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes by corona air plasma for separation of oil/water emulsions, Journal of Membrane Science, 430: 24-36. ##
[14]. Sexena N, Prabhavathy C, De S, DasGupta S (2009) Flux enhancement by argon-oxygen plasma treatment of polyethersulfone membranes, Separation and Purification Technology, 70: 160-165. ##
[15]. Farokhi B, Rezaaei M, Kiamehr Z, Hosseini S M (2019) A new approach to provide high water permeable polyethersulfone based nanofiltration membrane by Air plasma treatment, International Journal of Engineering (IJE), 32: 354-359. ##
[16]. Mohammed S, Hegab H M, Ou R, Liu S, Ma H, Chen X, Sridhar T, Wang H (2021) Effect of oxygen plasma treatment on the nanofiltration performance of reduced graphene oxide/cellulose nanofiber composite membranes, Green Chemical Engineering, 2: 122-131. ##
[17]. Xu W L, Zhou F, Yu M (2018) Tuning water nanofiltration performance of few-layered, reduced graphene oxide membranes by oxygen plasma, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 57: 16103-16109. ##
[18]. Kim E S, Yu Q, Deng B (2011) Plasma surface modification of nanofiltration (NF) thin-film composite (TFC) membranes to improve anti organic fouling, Applied Surface Science, 257: 9863-9871. ##
[19]. Han R, Zhang S, Liu C, Wang Y, Jian X (2009) Effect of NaA zeolite particle addition on poly (phthalazinone ether sulfone ketone) composite ultrafiltration (UF) membrane performance, Journal of Membrane Science, 345: 3455-3462. ##
[20]. Lee H S, Im S J, Kim J H, Kim H J, Kim J P, Min B R (2008) Polyamide thin-film NF membranes containing TiO2 nanoparticles, Desalination, 219: 48-56. ##
[21]. Hegde C, Isloor A M, Padaki M, Fun H K (2013) Synthesis and performance characterization of PS-PPEES nanoporous membranes with nonwoven porous support, Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 6: 319-326. ##