Comparative Performance Analysis of FAWAG for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Gas-Invaded Fractured Reservoirs

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Institute of Petroleum Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Enhancing oil recovery from hydrocarbon reservoirs, particularly in mature and naturally fractured fields, is one of the key challenges in reservoir engineering. Water Alternating Gas (WAG) injection has gained considerable attention due to its ability to reduce the gas–oil ratio (GOR) and improve sweep efficiency; however, limitations such as high gas mobility and poor volumetric efficiency highlight the need for more advanced techniques. In this study, the Foam-Assisted Water Alternating Gas (FAWAG) process was investigated using three-dimensional reservoir simulation with a dual-porosity model, in which the main reservoir characteristics included a low-permeability matrix (5 mD) and high-permeability fractures (100 mD) to accurately simulate the crossflow phenomenon. Moreover, foam was modeled through a set of mobility reduction functions dependent on pressure, water and oil saturation, as well as adsorption on the rock surface, in order to control gas flow in fractures, restrict its penetration into high-permeability zones, and direct fluids toward low-permeability regions. The results demonstrated that the FAWAG method increased oil recovery to 34% and reduced the gas–oil ratio by 40%, outperforming other enhanced oil recovery methods such as water injection, miscible gas injection, and foam injection. This improvement is mainly attributed to gas mobility control by foam and more effective pressure distribution within the reservoir. The findings emphasize the importance of optimizing the key parameters of the injection process and open a new pathway for further laboratory and field-scale investigations.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1]. Yang, J., & Hou, J. (2020). Experimental study on gas channeling characteristics of nitrogen and foam flooding in 2-D visualized fractured-vuggy model. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 192, 107334. doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107334.##
[2]. Parvazdavani, M., Ebrahimzadeh Rajaee, S., & Gerami, S. (2024). The challenges of designing enhanced oil recovery methods in large gas cap fractured reservoirs and their solutions by the approach of advanced screening. Journal of Petroleum Research, 34(1403-5), 35-65. doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22078/pr.2024.5335.3375. ##
[3]. Shabib-Asl, A., Ayoub, M. A., Alta’ee, A. F., Saaid, I. B. M., & Valentim, P. P. J. (2014). Comprehensive review of foam application during foam assisted water alternating gas (FAWAG) method. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology. doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.8.1179. ##
[4]. Fernø, M. A., Eide, Ø., Steinsbø, M., Langlo, S. A. W., Christophersen, A., Skibenes, A., Ydstebø, T. & Graue, A. (2015). Mobility control during CO2 EOR in fractured carbonates using foam: Laboratory evaluation and numerical simulations. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 135, 442-451. doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.10.005. ##
[5]. Belazreg, L., & Mahmood, S. M. (2020). Water alternating gas incremental recovery factor prediction and WAG pilot lessons learned. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 10(2), 249-269. doi.org/10.1007/s13202-019-0694-x. ##
[6]. Skauge A., Stensen J. Å. (2003). Review of WAG Field Experience, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267039859. ##
[7]. Afzali, S., Rezaei, N., & Zendehboudi, S. (2018). A comprehensive review on enhanced oil recovery by water alternating gas (WAG) injection. Fuel, 227, 218-246. doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.04.015. ##
[8]. Uj, I., & Fekete, T. (2011, July). CO2 Gas+ WAG+ Water Injection in the same oil reservoir-case study. In SPE Asia Pacific Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference (pp. SPE-143833). SPE. doi.org/10.2118/143833-MS. ##
[9]. Asghari M. & Behnam S. (2025). Investigating the computational fluid dynamics of temperature impact on underground hydrogen storage in carbon dioxide-containing salt caverns, Journal of Petroleum Research 140. 55–67. doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22078/pr.2024.5437.3418. ##
[10]. Groot, H., Groenenboom, J., Kechut, N. I., Razali, N. R., Vincent-Bonnieu, S., & Mar-Or, A. (2019). Screening and uncertainty assessment of foam-assisted water-alternate gas injection. In IOR 2019–20th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 2019(1), 1-22. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201900106. ##
[11]. Farajzadeh, R., Bertin, H., & Rossen, W. R. (2020). Editorial to the special issue: foam in porous media for petroleum and environmental engineering—experience sharing. Transport in Porous Media, 131(1), 1-3. doi.org/10.1007/s11242-019-01329-4. ##
[12]. Bobreneva, Y. O., Mazitov, A. A., & Gubaydullin, I. M. (2018). Mathematical modelling of fluid flow processes in the fracture-porous reservoir. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1096(1), 012187. IOP Publishing. doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1096/1/012187. ##
[13]. AlMaqbali, A., Agada, S., Geiger, S., Haugen, Å., & Fernø, M. A. (2015, November). Modelling foam displacement in fractured carbonate reservoirs. In Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference (p. D031S044R001). SPE. doi.org/10.2118/177600-MS. ##
[14]. Khatib, Z. I., Hirasaki, G. J., & Falls, A. H. (1988). Effects of capillary pressure on coalescence and phase mobilities in foams flowing through porous media. SPE reservoir engineering, 3(03), 919-926. doi.org/10.2118/15442-PA. ##
[15]. Farajzadeh, R., Wassing, B., & Boerrigter, P. (2010, September). Foam assisted gas oil gravity drainage in naturally-fractured reservoirs. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition? (pp. SPE-134203). SPE. doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2012.06.029. ##
[16]. Ma, K., Lopez-Salinas, J. L., Puerto, M. C., Miller, C. A., Biswal, S. L., & Hirasaki, G. J. (2013). Estimation of parameters for the simulation of foam flow through porous media. Part 1: the dry-out effect. Energy & fuels, 27(5), 2363-2375. doi.org/10.1021/ef302036s. ##
[17]. Chekani, M., & Kharrat, R. (2009). Reservoir rock typing in a carbonate reservoir-cooperation of core and log data: case study. In SPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition (pp. SPE-123703). SPE. doi.org/10.2118/123703-ms. ##
[18]. Asghari, M., Niri, M. E., & Sedaee, B. (2025). UHSNet: Deep learning-based smart proxy modeling for underground hydrogen storage. Energy, 136763. doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.136763. ##
[19]. Topini, C., De Simoni, M., Dovera, L., Rotelli, F., Bartosek, M., Abrar, A., Renna, D. & Braccalenti, E. (2019). Foam to optimize gas injection development scheme: labs evidence and simulation forecast of gas control efficiency. In IOR 2019–20th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery,  2019(1), 1-22. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201900104. ##
[20]. Razavi, S. M. H., Shahmardan, M. M., Nazari, M., & Norouzi, M. (2020). Experimental study of the effects of surfactant material and hydrocarbon agent on foam stability with the approach of enhanced oil recovery. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 585, 124047. doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.124047. ##
[21]. Schramm, L. L., & Mannhardt, K. (1996). The effect of wettability on foam sensitivity to crude oil in porous media. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 15(1), 101-113. doi.org/10.1016/0920-4105(95)00068-2. ##
[22]. Beheshti, E., Riahi, S., & Riazi, M. (2022). Impacts of oil components on the stability of aqueous bulk CO2 foams: An experimental study. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 648, 129328.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129328. ##
[23]. Mohamed, A. I., Sultan, A. S., Hussein, I. A., & Al-Muntasheri, G. A. (2017). Influence of surfactant structure on the stability of water‐in‐oil emulsions under high‐temperature high‐salinity conditions. Journal of Chemistry, 2017(1), 5471376. doi.org/10.1155/2017/5471376. ##
[24]. AlYousef, Z., Almobarky, M., & Schechter, D. (2017). Enhancing the stability of foam by the use of nanoparticles. Energy & Fuels, 31(10), 10620-10627. doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b01697. ##
[25]. Li, R. F., Yan, W., Liu, S., Hirasaki, G. J., & Miller, C. A. (2010). Foam mobility control for surfactant enhanced oil recovery. SPE Journal, 15(04), 928-942. doi.org/10.2118/113910-pa. ##
[26]. Behera, U. S., Sangwai, J. S., Baskaran, D., & Byun, H. S. (2024). A Comprehensive Review on Low Salinity Water Injection for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Fundamental Insights, Laboratory and Field Studies, and Economic Aspects. Energy & Fuels, 39(1), 72-103. doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c04562. ##
[27]. Muñoz Mazo, E. O., Montoya Moreno, J. M., & Schiozer, D. J. (2007, April). Study of sweep efficiency of water injection under fracturing-conditions process. In SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference (pp. SPE-107846). SPE. doi.org/10.2118/107846-ms. ##
[28]. Mehrjoo, H., Kazemzadeh, Y., Safaei, A., & Riazi, M. (2024). Modification of interfacial tension by considering the effect of porous medium during near miscible gas injection. Scientia Iran. doi.org/10.24200/sci.2024.60182.6648. ##
[29]. Kaita, A. Y., Ogolo, O., Wu, X., Mohammed, I., & Akpan, E. A. (2020). Study of the impact of injection parameters on the performance of miscible sour gas injection for enhanced oil recovery. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 10(4), 1575-1589. doi.org/10.1007/s13202-019-00793-4.
[30]. Asghari, M., Moslehi, S., Emami Niri, M., & Kord, S. (2025). Prediction of minimum miscibility pressure of CO2-oil systems using grey-box modeling for carbon dioxide capture, utilization, storage, and enhanced oil recovery. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 15(3), 52. doi.org/10.1007/s13202-024-01900-w. ##
[31]. Allal, M. A., Brancolini, A., Smail, F., Kaaroud, Z., Kriat, M. A., & Elmutardi, M. (2023, October). Miscible Water Alternating Gas Injection WAG Field Scale Application in Algeria: An Effective Way to Improve Oil Recovery, Rejuvenate Mature Field and Develop Opportunities to Stream Gas Sales. In Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference (p. D012S144R003). SPE. doi.org/10.2118/216168-MS. ##
[32]. Nygård, J. I., & Andersen, P. Ø. (2020). Simulation of immiscible water-alternating-gas injection in a stratified reservoir: performance characterization using a new dimensionless number. SPE Journal, 25(04), 1711-1728. doi.org/10.2118/200479-PA. ##
[33]. Nygård, J. I., & Andersen, P. Ø. (2019, April). Simulation of immiscible wag injection in a stratified reservoir-Characterization of WAG performance. In IOR 2019–20th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 2019(1), 1-21. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201900170. ##
[34]. Youssif, M. I., Sharma, K. V., & Piri, M. (2023, March). Hydrocarbon gas foam injection in fractured oil-wet carbonate samples: An experimental investigation of the effect of fracture-matrix permeability contrast on oil recovery. In SPE Canadian Energy Technology Conference (p. D011S004R001). SPE. doi.org/10.2118/212736-MS. ##
[35]. S.L. Tham, A simulation study of enhanced oil recovery using carbon dioxide foam in heterogeneous reservoirTham, S. L. (2015). A simulation study of enhanced oil recovery using carbon dioxide foam in heterogeneous reservoirs. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition? (p. D023S099R022). SPE. doi.org/10.2118/178746-stu. ##
[36]. Memon, M. K., Elraies, K. A., & Al-Mossawy, M. I. (2017). Impact of new foam surfactant blend with water alternating gas injection on residual oil recovery. Journal of petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 7(3), 843-851. doi.org/10.1007/s13202-016-0303-1. ##
[37]. Ma, K., Liontas, R., Conn, C. A., Hirasaki, G. J., & Biswal, S. L. (2012). Visualization of improved sweep with foam in heterogeneous porous media using microfluidics. Soft Matter, 8(41), 10669-10675. doi.org/10.1039/c2sm25833a. ##