Investigation and Determination of the Appropriate Model for Relative Permeability in Iranian Carbonate Reservoirs

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

The determination of relative permeability model used in reservoir simulation software is the corner stone of reservoir studies. Nowadays, in order to estimate relative permeability, several models are presented, having their own features. Corey model is one of the most well-known models, because it has simple calculation. However, it behaves inappropriately in facing heterogenic carbonate rock. Also, insufficient studies on comparing different models on carbonate rock are undeniable. Therefore, the assessment of different models and determining the appropriate model to result in a better estimation in carbonate rock is the aim of this study. In this work, after conducting unsteady-state relative permeability experiment under reservoir conditions from three reservoirs, namely A, B, and C, the relative permeability was calculated by using JBN method. Then, all the models could be compared. According to the results, it can be concluded that the LET model in heterogenic carbonate rock (various rock type) leads to a better result compared with the other models and it causes a significant decrease in standard error value for the relative permeability of oil and water to 0.00488 and 0.00119. Furthermore, it is found that this model can predict the S-shape behavior of relative permeability, seeing in Iranian carbonate reservoirs, perfectly
 

Keywords

References

[1]. Corey A.T., “The interrelation between gas and oil relative permeabilities”, Prod. Monthly, Nov. 1954, pp. 38-41.##
[2]. Burdine N. T., “Relative permeability calculation from pore size distribution”, Trans., AIME, Oct. 1953, pp. 71-78.##
[3]. Sigmund P. M. and McCaffery F. G., “An improved unsteady-state procedure for determining the relative permeability characteristics of heterogeneous porous media”, SPEJ, Feb. 1979, pp. 15-28.##
[4]. Chierici G. L., “Novel relation for drainage and imbibition relative permeabilities”, SPEJ, Jun. 1984, pp. 275-276.##
[5]. Lomeland F., Ebeltoft E. and Thomas W. H., “A New versatile relative permeability correlation”, International Symposium of the SCA, Toronto, Aug. 2005.##
[6]. Amyx J. W., Bass Jr., D. M., Whiting R. L., “Petroleum reservoir engineering”, McGraw-Hill Book Company, London 1960, pp. 133-210.##
[7]. Tie H., and Norman R. Morrow, Oil recovery by spontaneous imbibitions before and after wettability alteration of three carbonate rocks by a moderately asphaltic crude oil, International Symposium of the SCA, SCA2005-11.##
[8]. Mungan N., “Certain wettability effects in laboratory waterfloods”, JPT, Feb. 1966, pp. 247-252.##
[9]. Tie H., Zhengxin T. and Norman R. Morrow, The effect of different crude oil/brine/rock combinations on wettability through spontaneous imbibitions, International Symposium of the SCA, Pau,France  SCA2003-02.##
[10]. Johnson E. F., Bossler D. P., and Naumann V. O., “Calculation of relative permeability from displacement experiments”, Trans, AIME, 1959, pp. 370–372.##
Journal of Petroleum Research
Volume 24, Issue 80 - Serial Number 80
March and April 2015
Pages 114-122

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics