Investigating Uncertainty of Gas-condensate Well Productivity with Vertical, Horizontal and Hydraulic-fractured Geometries

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

IOR Research Institute, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In order to accurately predict the performance of a gas condensate well, a numerical simulation with local grid refinement is inevitable, otherwise the effects of condensate blockage and high velocity of gas could not be properly captured. But, the complexities of such calculations make the numerical simulation time-consuming. On the other hand, to conduct an uncertainty analysis on the reservoir and well parameters, this calculation package must be repeated thousands of times. Therefore a faster method for calculation of gas condensate well flow rate is valuable. In this paper a fast semi-analytical method is introduced for calculation of flow rate in gas condensate wells and then based on Monte-Carlo procedure, an uncertainty analysis study is conducted for different well geometry. An uncertainty analysis is absolutely necessary at the beginning of a reservoir´s life, and it can help the reservoir managers to make the most possible realistic decision for development plan, infrastructure, and the sale contracts for produced gas and condensate. The results of the study show that investment on accurately determination of porosity is a wise decision for the specific studied reservoir. However this property can be different for another reservoir, depending on the reservoir and well properties.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1]. Fevang Ø. and Whitson C. H., “Modeling gas-condensate well deliverability,” SPE Res. Eng., Vol. 11, No. 04, pp. 221-230, 1996.##
[2].  Mott R., “Engineering calculations of gas-condensate-well productivity,” SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 05, pp. 298-306, 2003.##
[3]. Xiao J. J. and Al-Muraikhi A. J., “A new method for the determination of gas condensate well production performance,” SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2004.##
[4]. Murtha J., “Some challenges for monte carlo simulation,” The Way Ahead, Vol. 2, No. 02, pp. 13-18, 2006. ##
[5]. Luo H., Mahiya G., Pannett S. and Benham Ph. H., “The use of rate-transient-analysis modeling to quantify uncertainties in commingled tight gas production-forecasting and decline-analysis parameters in the alberta deep basin,” SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 02, pp. 209-219, 2014.##
[6]. Panja P. and Deo M., “Factors that control condensate production from shales: surrogate reservoir models and uncertainty analysis,” SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 01, pp.130-141, 2016.##
[7]. Whitson C. H., Fevang Ø. and Sævareid A., “Gas condensate relative permeability for well calculations,” Transport in Porous Media, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 279-311, 2003.##
[8]. Pope G. A., Wu W., Narayanaswamy G., Delshad M., Sharma M. M. and Wang P., “Modeling relative permeability effects in gas-condensate reservoirs with a new trapping model,” SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 02, pp. 171-178, 2000.##
[9]. Henderson Graeme D., Danesh A., Al-kharusi B. and Tehrani D., “Generating reliable gas condensate relative permeability data used to develop a correlation with capillary number,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 79-91, 2000.##
[10]. Jamiolahmady M., Sorabi M., Ireland S. and Ghahri P., “A generalized correlation for predicting gas–condensate relative permeability at near wellbore conditions,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Vol. 66, No. 3, pp. 98-110, 2009.##
[11]. Diyashev I. R. and Economides Michael J., “The dimensionless productivity index as a general approach to well evaluation,” SPE Production & Operations, Vol. 21, No. 03, pp. 394-401, 2006.##
[12]. Prats M., “Effect of vertical fractures on reservoir behavior-incompressible fluid case,” Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, Vol. 1, No. 02, pp. 105-118, 1961.##