غربالگری روش‌های مهار ماسه برای یکی از چاه‌های جنوب غرب ایران با استفاده از الگوریتم تاپسیس

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مهندسی نفت، دانشکده نفت اهواز، دانشگاه صنعت نفت، ایران

2 شرکت ملی مناطق نفت خیز جنوب

چکیده

تولید ماسه سازندی یکی از چالش‌های اساسی شرکت‌های بهره‌بردار در عملیات تکمیل و تولید از چاه‌های نفتی و گازی است. با توجه به آنکه در اکثر موارد، تولید ماسه امری اجتناب‌ناپذیر است، انتخاب روش مناسب کنترل ماسه و طراحی تکمیل چاه، موضوعی بسیار ضروری و کلیدی تلقی می‌شود و از جمله روش‌های بهبود تولید و افزایش بهره‌وری محسوب می‌گردد. بنابراین آنالیز و بررسی شرایط تولید ماسه و عوامل تأثیرگذار بر انتخاب هر روش کنترل تولید ماسه، دارای اهمیت فراوان در پایداری تولید می باشند که در این مطالعه با رویکردی داده محور مورد توجه قرار گرفته است. این مطالعه با تمرکز بر روش‌های داده محور، از تکنیک شباهت به راه حل ایده‌آل (الگوریتم تاپسیس) -به عنوان یکی از روش‌های تصمیم‌گیری چند معیاره- برای غربال‌گری مخازن نفتی جنوب غرب ایران که با مشکل تولید ماسه مواجه هستند، استفاده می‌کند. در این کار، با استفاده از  اطلاعات چاه‌های با مشکل تولید ماسه در دو میدان نفتی جنوب غرب ایران، مقدار ایده‌آل هر یک از معیار‌های مؤثر بر انتخاب سامانه مناسب مهار ماسه، استخراج شده است. سپس با به‌کارگیری روش تاپسیس در مسائل تصمیم‌گیری چند معیاره، به رتبه‌بندی روش‌های ‌مهار ماسه برای چاه‌های نفتی مورد مطالعه پرداخته شده است. نتایج نشان می دهد که جهت مهار ماسه، استفاده از روش رزین و آروماتیک در اولویت اول و روش‌های آستری شیار دار، توری انبساط‌پذیر، رزین و بستر شنی به ترتیب در رتبه‌های دوم تا پنجم قرار می‌گیرند.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Screening of Sand Control Methods for One Well in South Western of Iran Using TOPSIS Algorithm

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahshid Rajabi 1
  • Shahin Kord 1
  • Abdol-Nabi Hashemi 1
  • Reza Salehi 2
1 Petroleum Engineering Department, Petroleum University of Technology, Ahwaz, Iran
2 National Iranian South Oil Company,
چکیده [English]

Sand entering production wells is one of the oldest problems faced by oil companies and one of the toughest to solve. Production of sand during oil production causes severe operational problem for oil producers. Several techniques have been used for sand production control in sandstone reservoirs. Sand screens often serve as the primary barrier to sand production from weakly consolidated reservoirs. Screen technology has improved significantly in the areas of sand retention, mechanical integrity, and quality control. As future field developments trend towards more hostile environments, requiring fewer wells at higher rates, the overall reliability and longevity of sand screens will be increasingly more important in this high cost environment. Screening of IOR methods is a multi-criteria decision making process, and the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method as a systematic statistical method, can be applied in this regard. In this paper, the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) as one of the methods under the MCDM category was used to screen an Iranian oil well. The screening method was employed for 5 different sand control techniques using a wide range of properties and conditions. The analysis used a database of successful IOR projects across the Ahvaz and Mansuri fields. The relative importance of the reservoir parameters was determined based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) at eight importance levels. The findings showed that Resin – Aromatic is the best method for that well then Slotted liner, ESS, Resin and Gravel Pack are in next ranks.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • sand control
  • Improved Oil Recovery (IOR)
  • Sand control screening criteria
  • Data driven methods
  • TOPSIS algorithm
[1]. Khamehchi E, Ameri O, Alizadeh A (2015) Choosing an optimum sand control method, Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, 24, 2, 193-202.##

[2]. Ikporo B, Sylvester O (2015) Effect of sand invasion on oil well production: a case study of Garon field in the Niger Delta, The International Journal of Engineering and Science, 4, 5: 64-72. ##

[3]. Hodge RM, Burton RC, Constien V, Skidmore V (2002) An evaluation method for screen-only and gravel-pack completions, in International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Society of Petroleum Engineers. ##

[4]. Changyin D, ZHANG Q, Kaige G, Kangmin Y, Xingwu F, Chong Z (2016) Screen sand retaining precision optimization experiment and a new empirical design model, Petroleum Exploration and Development, 43, 6, 1082-1088. ##

[5]. A. Gupta, Gupta A, Kamat D, Zulkapli MHB, Borhan NAB, Kobbeltvedt A, Hammersmark J, Sam A (2016) An alternate sand handling technology for efficient sand management: pilot and way forward, in Offshore Technology Conference Asia, Offshore Technology Conference. ##

[6]. Moghadasi J., Jamialahmadi M, Müller-Steinhagen H, Sharif A, Izadpanah MR, Motaei E, Barati R (2002) Formation damage in Iranian oil fields, in International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Society of Petroleum Engineers. ##

[7]. Soroush M, Hosseini SA, Roostaei M, Pourafshary P, Mahmoudi M, Ghalambor A, Fattahpour V (2020) Challenges and potentials for sand control design and management in oil reservoirs of kazakhstan, in SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Society of Petroleum Engineers. ##

[8]. Schwartz DH (1969) Successful sand control design for high rate oil and water wells, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 21, 09, 1,193-1,198. ##

[9]. Tiffin D, King G, Larese R, Britt L (1998) New criteria for gravel and screen selection for sand control, in SPE Formation Damage Control Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers. ##

[10]. Suman GO, Ellis RC, Snyder RE (1983) Sand control handbook: prevent production losses and avoid well damage with these latest field-proven techniques, Gulf Publishing Company, Book Division. ##

[11]. Bouhroum A, Civan F (1993) A critical review of existing gravel-pack design criteria, in Technical Meeting/Petroleum Conference of The South Saskatchewan Section, Petroleum Society of Canada. ##

[12]. Ahad NA, Jami M, Tyson S (2020) A review of experimental studies on sand screen selection for unconsolidated sandstone reservoirs, Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, pp. 1-14.

[13]. آذرپناه ا. و حضرتی ف.، تولید شن در چاهای تکمیل شده مخزن آسماری اهواز و روش‌های کنترل آن، کتابخانه شرکت ملی مناطق نفتخیز جنوب، اهواز، 1367. ##

[14]. Hooshmandkoochi A, Hadjizadeh H (2007) First installation of an openhole expandable sand screen completion in the iranian oilfields leads to operational success and production enhancement--a case history, in Production and Operations Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers. ##

[15]. Salehi-Moorkani R, Safian GA, Mirzaei Paiaman A (2010) Successful applications of expandable sand screen in persian oil fields, Part 1, in SPE Production and Operations Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers. ##

[16]. Deilami F, Salehi-Moorkani R, Ghasemzadeh A (2010) Successful applications of expandable sand screen in Persian oil fields, Part 2, in SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers. ##

[17]. Behzadian M, Otaghsara SK, Yazdani M, Ignatius J (2012) A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications, Expert Systems with applications, 39, 17, 13051-13069. ##

[18]. Khamehchi E, YousefiSH, Sanaei A (2013) Selection of the Best Efficient Method for Natural Gas Storage at High Capacities Using TOPSIS Method, 1, 1: 9-18. ##

[19]. Alemi M, Jalalifar H, Kamali G, Kalbasi M (2010) A prediction to the best artificial lift method selection on the basis of TOPSIS model,  Journal of Petroleum and Gas Engineering, 1, 1: 009-015. ##

[20]. Nureize A, Watada J (2010) A fuzzy regression approach to a hierarchical evaluation model for oil palm fruit grading, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 9, 1: 105-122. ##

[21]. Wang YM, Elhag TM (2006) Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment, Expert systems with applications, 31, 2: 309-319. ##

[22]. Yang T, Hung CC (2007) Multiple-attribute decision making methods for plant layout design problem, Robotics and computer-integrated manufacturing, 23, 1: 126-137. ##

[23]. Ertuğrul İ, Karakaşoğlu N (2009) Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 1:  702-715. ##

[24]. Lotfi FH, Fallahnejad R, Navidi N (2011) Ranking efficient units in DEA by using TOPSIS method, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 5, 17: 805-815. ##

[25]. Fatahi E, Jalalifar H, Pourafshari P, Moradi B (2012) Selection of the best artificial lift method for one of the Iranian oil field using multiple attribute decision making methods, International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2: 2. ##

[26]. Destiny Ugo P (2015) A multi-criteria decision making for location selection in the niger delta using fuzzy TOPSIS approach, International Journal of Management and Business Research, 5, 3: 215-224. ##

[27]. Esfandiari M, Rizvandi M (2014) An application of TOPSIS method for ranking different strategic planning methodology, Management Science Letters, 4, 7: 1445-1448. ##

[28]. Chen KH, Liao CN, Wu LC (2014) A selection model to logistic centers based on TOPSIS and MCGP methods: the case of airline industry, Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2014. ##

[29]. CL Hwang, Masud ASM (2012) Multiple objective decision making—methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey, Springer Science & Business Media. ##

[30]. Rostampour S (2012) An application of TOPSIS for ranking internet web browsers, Decision Science Letters, 1, 2: 53-58.

[31]. Yoon KP, Hwang CL (1990) Multiple attribute decision making: an introduction, Sage publications, 1995. ##

[32]. Saaty TL (1990) Decision making for leaders: the analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world. RWS publications. ##

[33]. Alonso JA, Lamata MT (2006) Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: a new approach, International journal of uncertainty, fuzziness and knowledge-based systems, 14, 04: 445-459. ##